PERFORMANCE

AGAINST STRATEGY

PERFORMANCE AGAINST STRATEGY

SAICA’s Board sets short-term targets and initiatives for the year ahead in the annual balanced scorecard that support delivery on the strategic pillars, either directly or by enhancing the Institute’s operational efficiency. At the end of the year, executive management collates the performance against the balanced scorecard targets. The final scores are assured by the external auditors, reviewed by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the Board.

During the reporting period, good progress was made to execute on the strategic initiatives underpinning the four strategic pillars of the SAICA strategy.

Where targets were not achieved, corrective measures have been identified to improve performance in the coming year.

The balanced scorecard comprised four categories weighted as shown in the table on the next page. Each balanced scorecard category is given a score from 1 (far below expectations) to 5 (far exceeds expectations) and these scores are weighted according to the category weights to yield an overall score for the year. In 2022, SAICA achieved a performance rating of 3.68 out of 5, compared to 3,47 out of 5 in 2021.

SAICA’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE SCORE AGAINST STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

The Member Value strategic pillar PHI score, Relevance and Reputation strategic pillar and PHI scores both improved and the Trust index of CAs(SA) in South Africa remained stable at 83% as a result of the implementation of SAICA’s integrated communication and reputation management plan.
SAICA’s B-BBEE level significantly improved from Level 8 to Level 4 as a result of the strong focus on skills development. The Employee Engagement score also improved from 75% to 78%, which demonstrates that SAICA employees are well engaged.

SAICA’s Board sets short-term targets and initiatives for the year ahead in the annual balanced scorecard that support delivery on the strategic pillars, either directly or by enhancing the Institute’s operational efficiency. At the end of the year, executive management collates the performance against the balanced scorecard targets. The final scores are assured by the external auditors, reviewed by the Remuneration Committee and approved by the Board.

During the reporting period, good progress was made to execute on the strategic initiatives underpinning the four strategic pillars of the SAICA strategy.

Where targets were not achieved, corrective measures have been identified to improve performance in the coming year.

The balanced scorecard comprised four categories weighted as shown in the table on the next page. Each balanced scorecard category is given a score from 1 (far below expectations) to 5 (far exceeds expectations) and these scores are weighted according to the category weights to yield an overall score for the year. In 2022, SAICA achieved a performance rating of 3.68 out of 5, compared to 3,47 out of 5 in 2021.

SAICA’S OVERALL PERFORMANCE SCORE AGAINST STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

The Member Value strategic pillar PHI score, Relevance and Reputation strategic pillar and PHI scores both improved and the Trust index of CAs(SA) in South Africa remained stable at 83% as a result of the implementation of SAICA’s integrated communication and reputation management plan.
SAICA’s B-BBEE level significantly improved from Level 8 to Level 4 as a result of the strong focus on skills development. The Employee Engagement score also improved from 75% to 78%, which demonstrates that SAICA employees are well engaged.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE SCORE AGAINST STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

2022

3,68

2021

3,47

2020

3,68

Key metrics - Professional Health Index1

2022 2021 2020
Member Value PHI score1
75,14%
72,55%
75,77%
Relevance and Reputation score
77,96%
64,16%
69,16%
B-BBEE level
4
8
6
Employee Engagement score2
78%
75%
75%
  • 1 The Professional Health Index (PHI) is the measure by which SAICA assesses the extent to which it has achieved its strategic intent ‘to contribute to sustainable economies through developing responsible and ethical leaders’.
  • 2The Employee Engagement score is calculated by adding the ‘agree’ and ‘strongly agree’ ratings.

OVERALL PERFORMANCE SCORE AGAINST STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

2022

3,68

2021

3,47

2020

3,68

Key metrics - Professional Health Index1

2022 2021 2020
Member Value PHI score1
75,14%
72,55%
75,77%
Relevance and Reputation score
77,96%
64,16%
69,16%
B-BBEE level
4
8
6
Employee Engagement score2
78%
75%
75%
  • 1 The Professional Health Index (PHI) is the measure by which SAICA assesses the extent to which it has achieved its strategic intent ‘to contribute to sustainable economies through developing responsible and ethical leaders’.
  • 2The Employee Engagement score is calculated by adding the ‘agree’ and ‘strongly agree’ ratings.

Member value (2022: 75,14%) (2021: 72,55%)

SAICA PROFESSIONAL HEALTH INDEX 2022 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL) 2021 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL)
Attractiveness Score
86,16%
63,16%
Employability Index
75,81%
74,12%
Leadership Index
79,61%
78,19%
Inspiration Index
74,67%
76,48%
Brand Admiration Index
79,89%
79,80%
Competency Index
69,84%
67,69%
Member Satisfaction Index
67,31%
68,42%

Member value (2022: 75,14%) (2021: 72,55%)

SAICA PROFESSIONAL HEALTH INDEX 2022 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL) 2021 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL)
Attractiveness Score
86,16%
63,16%
Employability Index
75,81%
74,12%
Leadership Index
79,61%
78,19%
Inspiration Index
74,67%
76,48%
Brand Admiration Index
79,89%
79,80%
Competency Index
69,84%
67,69%
Member Satisfaction Index
67,31%
68,42%

Relevance & Reputation (2022: 77,96%) (2021: 64,16%)

SAICA PROFESSIONAL HEALTH INDEX 2022 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL) 2021 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL)
Integrity Index
72,41%
72,58%
Market Trust Index
83,88%
84,55%
Social Contribution Index
77,60%
76,06%

Relevance & Reputation (2022: 77,96%) (2021: 64,16%)

SAICA PROFESSIONAL HEALTH INDEX 2022 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL) 2021 SURVEY RESULTS (% ABOVE NEUTRAL)
Integrity Index
72,41%
72,58%
Market Trust Index
83,88%
84,55%
Social Contribution Index
77,60%
76,06%